Free to list, always.No paid rankings. Every recommendation explains its trade-offs.
OpenSourceChoice

_ \ * Taylor \ * _ is a solution for the PA to manage the relationship with the citizen and his/her requests. A platform with an effective backoffice for ticket management, and th Key capabilities include CRM, Ticketing system, I. Common stack signals: linux.

Taylor upstream project preview
Upstream preview from the project website or source repository. The current interface may differ.

Best for Operations teamscore business records need an open, adaptable workflow

Skip iflocal regulations or accounting rules are not supportedMore

Open-source alternative toIndependent open-source project
01

What it is

_ \ * Taylor \ * _ is a solution for the PA to manage the relationship with the citizen and his/her requests. A platform with an effective backoffice for ticket management, and th GitHub popularity: 1 stars and 1 forks.

Teams can evaluate Taylor within its category while keeping the implementation, license, and repository signals visible. Confirm the official documentation against your exact workflow before treating it as a production dependency.

EU catalogue
Developers ItaliaStandalone/WebStable
Built with
See repository architecture
02

Who it’s for — and when to skip it

Operations teams

Use it when core business records need an open, adaptable workflow.

Skip if local regulations or accounting rules are not supported.

Growing companies

Consider it when avoiding vendor lock-in is worth owning configuration and migration work.

Skip if implementation and training capacity are unavailable.

Technical founders

Evaluate it when source access enables product-specific integrations and automation.

Skip if a fully managed, contract-backed service is required immediately.

03

Strengths and trade-offs

Why teams consider it

CRM

Ticketing system

I

Source code and AGPL-3.0-or-later license are visible before adoption

Repository metrics are available for independent review

What to validate

A public repository does not automatically guarantee a documented self-hosting path

GitHub popularity is not a security, quality, or product-fit guarantee

The AGPL-3.0-or-later license still needs review against your distribution and commercial model

Support quality, migration effort, and production hardening vary by project

04

Capabilities and stack fit

01CRM
02Ticketing system
03I

Catalog metadata supports discovery, not installation. Verify supported versions, dependencies, deployment topology, and production requirements in the official repository.

05

Guides for Taylor

No project-specific guide is published yet.

Use the learning library to find a guide by technology, category, or difficulty.

Browse guides
06

Approved community reviews

No approved review signal yet.

We do not display synthetic testimonials or ratings without sufficient moderated data.

07

Before you adopt it

  1. 01

    Read the license and confirm it fits your intended use and distribution model.

  2. 02

    Review recent commits, open issues, releases, and the maintainer response pattern.

  3. 03

    Run a small proof of concept with representative data, users, and integrations.

  4. 04

    Confirm whether an official deployment or self-hosting guide exists.

  5. 05

    Document an export or migration path before storing critical data.

Similar open source projects

Continue your evaluation.

Shared metadata creates discovery leads, not automatic recommendations.

django-delivery

Manage delivery of goods, such as sim cards or 4 g routers.

Apache-2.0 · 2 stars
Integreat CMS

The multilingual content management system for the Integreat App

Apache-2.0 · 62 stars
uniAuth

Identity Provider per la gestione del SingleSignOn

Apache-2.0 · 47 stars